Atypical acute myeloid leukemia-specific transcripts generate shared and immunogenic MHC class-I-associated epitopes.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not benefited from innovative immunotherapies, mainly because of the lack of actionable immune targets. Using an original proteogenomic approach, we analyzed the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC class I)-associated immunopeptidome of 19 primary AML samples and identified 58 tumor-specific antigens (TSAs). These TSAs bore no mutations and derived mainly (86%) from supposedly non-coding genomic regions. Two AML-specific aberrations were instrumental in the biogenesis of TSAs, intron retention, and epigenetic changes. Indeed, 48% of TSAs resulted from intron retention and translation, and their RNA expression correlated with mutations of epigenetic modifiers (e.g., DNMT3A). AML TSA-coding transcripts were highly shared among patients and were expressed in both blasts and leukemic stem cells. In AML patients, the predicted number of TSAs correlated with spontaneous expansion of cognate T cell receptor clonotypes, accumulation of activated cytotoxic T cells, immunoediting, and improved survival. These TSAs represent attractive targets for AML immunotherapy.

T-Cell Immunotherapies Targeting Histocompatibility and Tumor Antigens in Hematological Malignancies.

Over the last decades, T-cell immunotherapy has revealed itself as a powerful, and often curative, strategy to treat blood cancers. In hematopoietic cell transplantation, most of the so-called graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) effect hinges on the recognition of histocompatibility antigens that reflect immunologically relevant genetic variants between donors and recipients. Whether other variants acquired during the neoplastic transformation, or the aberrant expression of gene products can yield antigenic targets of similar relevance as the minor histocompatibility antigens is actively being pursued. Modern genomics and proteomics have enabled the high throughput identification of candidate antigens for immunotherapy in both autologous and allogeneic settings. As such, these major histocompatibility complex-associated tumor-specific (TSA) and tumor-associated antigens (TAA) can allow for the targeting of multiple blood neoplasms, which is a limitation for other immunotherapeutic approaches, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells. We review the current strategies taken to translate these discoveries into T-cell therapies and propose how these could be introduced in clinical practice. Specifically, we discuss the criteria that are used to select the antigens with the greatest therapeutic value and we review the various T-cell manufacturing approaches in place to either expand antigen-specific T cells from the native repertoire or genetically engineer T cells with minor histocompatibility antigen or TSA/TAA-specific recombinant T-cell receptors. Finally, we elaborate on the current and future incorporation of these therapeutic T-cell products into the treatment of hematological malignancies.

Leukoreduction system chambers are a reliable cellular source for the manufacturing of T-cell therapeutics.

BACKGROUND: Following solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplantation, refractory opportunistic viral reactivations are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality but can effectively be controlled by virus-specific T-cell transfer. Among effective and safe strategies is the use of "third-party" (neither from the transplant donor nor recipient) virus-specific T cells that can be manufactured from healthy donors and used as "off-the-shelf" therapies. Leukoreduction system chambers (LRSCs), recovered after routine plateletpheresis, were evaluated as a potential source of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for the manufacturing of clinical-scale virus-specific T cell. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBMCs from the same donors obtained either from LRSCs or peripheral blood were compared, focusing on T-cell function and phenotype as well as the potential to generate cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell lines from both CMV seropositive and seronegative donors. RESULTS: PBMCs from both sources were comparable except for a transient downregulation of CD62L expression on freshly extracted PBMCs from LRSCs. Both nonspecific stimulation using anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies and CMV peptides revealed that LRSCs or blood T cells were equivalent in terms of expansion, differentiation, and function. Moreover, PBMCs from LRSCs can be used to generate autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells to prime and expand CMV-specific T cells from seronegative donors. CONCLUSION: LRSCs are a reliable source of PBMCs for the generation of virus-specific T cells for immunotherapy. These findings have implications for the development of third-party therapeutic T-cell products from well-characterized blood product donors.